Skip to content
You are here: Home
PHMSA’s New Enforcement Plan
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) announced, in March, a new approach to enforcing the hazardous materials regulations. It is called the Systems Integrity Safety Program (SISP). In this report Mr. Bunn gives an overview of the program, the criteria specified in the memorandum to qualify for entry, and a synopsis of the System Integrity Safety Program.

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) has announced a new approach to enforcing the hazardous materials regulations.  It is called the Systems Integrity Safety Program (SISP).   The initiative is detailed in the SISP National Policy Memorandum (and in three other associated documents), issued by the Office of Hazardous Materials Enforcement (OHME)’s Director Ryan Posten, dated February 29, 2008. These can be found here: http://hazmat.dot.gov/enforce/hmenforce.htm. (These documents are located under Systems Integrity Safety Program). This review attempts to summarize and initially critique the SISP.  Note that all quotations are taken directly from the National Policy Memorandum.  Ed. Note:  A powerpoint presentation developed by Mr. Posten’s is posted on HazMat Packager & Shipper’s website under the HazMat Presentations section of the HazMat Reference Gateway. This presentation may be viewed here .

Overview
The program seeks to improve transportation safety utilizing a “risk-based enforcement system” enabling PHMSA to set priorities to “focus our resources on those companies posing the greatest risk to transportation safety and security”.  Further, and innovatively:      “Rather than engaging in an adversarial process, PHMSA will provide in-depth analyses, observations, and cooperative follow-up investigations to identify the root causes of the entity’s safety problems”.  During a “partnership” period with the company (entity) the traditional violation and civil penalty processes are suspended.  Excepted are “violations that present an imminent hazard or that demonstrate a criminal (willful) intent”.

Application
Entities which qualify for participation must meet criteria specified in the memorandum.  The participant must be a regulated entity defined as:

 “A person who—(i) transports hazardous material in commerce; (ii) causes hazardous material to be transported in commerce; (iii) designs, manufactures, fabricates, inspects, marks, maintains, reconditions, repairs, or tests a package, container, or packaging component that is represented, marked, certified, or sold as qualified for use in transporting hazardous material in commerce; (iv) prepares or accepts hazardous material for transportation in commerce; (v) is responsible for the safety of transporting hazardous material in commerce; (vi) certifies compliance with any requirement under chapter 51 of Title 49 of the United States Code; or (vii) misrepresents whether such person is engaged in any activity under clause (i) through (vi) (49 U.S.C. § 5103(b)(A)(i-vii)).”

This article, in its entirety,  is archived in HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's HazMat Database, an optional feature to subscribers. Information on obtaining a subscription to HAZMAT Packager & Shipper and its associated features can be found here.
 
 
Site Tools
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

Recent Examples of our Expert Level Analysis

PHMSA’s New Enforcement Plan

Preemption Argument against State Licensure Fees

Comments on DOT Interpretation letters; Section 178.2

Comments on DOT Interpretation letters; Sections 173.2a and 173.115

Miscellaneous Amendments to the HMR in HM-218D

Chemical Compatibility of Plastics Packaging

Question and Answer re 49 CFR 173.4, Small Quantity Exceptions

An Update on TSA Progress in Establishing a List of Security Sensitive Materials

Cross Bottling Composite IBCs intended for Hazardous Materials

Public Comments -- Proposed Recommended Practices for Bulk Loading and Unloading of Hazardous Materials in Transportation

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 173.217

UN Meetings in Geneva

Docket HM-215I Review

Security Regulations for Chemical Facilities

DOT announcements made at a recent DGAC meeting

Vibration Testing of IBCs with Water
 
UN Is Close to a Decision on Revised Limited Quantities Requirements

Problems with High Level DOT Specification Packaging Markings

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 172.401 and 172.407

Combustible Liquids: Dis-Harmonization Still Rules

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800

IMO DSC Subcommittee -- Dangerous Goods By Vessel

ICAO Panel Finalizes Amendments to ICAO Technical Instructions

Small Quantity Shipments

Revised ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 172.504

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation, Sections 171.8 and 173.25

Does a Generic LQ Mark for Limited Quantities Offer any Benefit

Shipping Name Markings on Portable Tanks

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.22 and 178.2

Questions for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

The Latest Round in the Revisions to the ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 171.16(d)

Summary of DOT’s FY2005 Hazardous Materials Penalty Action Report

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.12(c) and 173.28

UN Sub-Committee Meeting Report

Workshop on Reducing the Risk of Hazardous Materials Incidents During Loading and Unloading Operations 

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 172.802

Issues with Docket HM-206F NPRM

Where is DOT’s packaging testing program headed

Combination Packaging for Dangerous Goods Liquids Problem Assessment

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 172.101 and 173.199

Shipping ORM-D Consumer Commodity By Air