| Cross Bottling Composite IBCs intended for Hazardous Materials |
|
In the Intermediate Bulk Container (IBC) industry, the practice of cross bottling or re-bottling composite IBCs with rigid plastics inner receptacles purchased from manufacturers other than the original supplier of the receptacle or the outer cage is becoming quite common during the reprocessing of these containers. This practice raises questions and concerns that are currently being reviewed by industry and international and domestic regulatory experts alike. In this report Ms. Hauge looks at the problem of marking these receptacles, packaging integrity, and vibration testing.
In
the Intermediate Bulk Container (IBC) industry, the practice of cross
bottling or re-bottling composite IBCs with rigid plastics inner
receptacles purchased from manufacturers other than the original
supplier of the receptacle or the outer cage, is becoming quite common
during the reprocessing of these containers. (The
composite IBCs in question consist of a rigid plastics inner
receptacle, commonly called a bottle, in a metal cage which is then
affixed to a pallet.) This practice raises questions and
concerns that are currently being reviewed by industry and
international and domestic regulatory experts alike.
Under
the definition for repaired IBCs, the United Nations Model Regulations
for the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN Orange Book) and the U.S.
Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) both state that the replacement of the rigid inner
receptacle of a composite IBC with a receptacle conforming to the
original manufacturer’s specification, is considered a repair. The
UN Orange Book and DOT 49 CFR both state that a repaired IBC shall be
subjected to an inspection to confirm that (1) the IBC conforms to the
design type, (2) the internal and external conditions of
the IBC are satisfactory, and (3) the service equipment is functioning
properly. If the IBC is intended for solids discharged under pressure,
or will be used to transport a liquid, the packaging must also be
subjected to a leakproofness test. Additionally, DOT 49 CFR states the
repaired IBC must be capable of withstanding the applicable design
qualification tests.
Upon
successful completion of design qualification testing, composite IBCs
are required to be marked with the corresponding primary UN marking on
the outermost metal cage In addition, and dependent upon the specific design and intended use, the inner receptacle must also
be marked with, at a minimum, the name and address or symbol of the
manufacturer, the date of manufacture and the country authorizing the
allocation of the mark. If the IBC is designed to be dismantled for transport when empty, each of the parts intended to be detached must also be marked with the month and year of manufacture and the name or symbol of the manufacturer. Markings may become confusing. A reconditioner often will obtain a previously used composite IBC or IBC component, repair or recondition the container, and then resell it to a new owner. This
may, or may not, include replacing the bottle with a bottle
manufactured by a company other than the bottle that was originally
subjected to design qualification testing. Parties that
originally designed, manufactured and tested the IBCs, and whose marks
appear on the packaging, have no control over the components used in
the repair process.
This article, in its entirety, is archived in HAZMAT Packager &
Shipper's HazMat Database, an optional feature to subscribers. Information on obtaining a subscription to HAZMAT Packager & Shipper and its associated features can be found here.
|
| Subscribe |
| Request an Obligation Free Trial Subscription |
| Tell A Friend |
| Copyright Statement |