Skip to content
You are here: Home
An Update on TSA Progress in Establishing a List of Security Sensitive Materials
As previously discussed in the January/February 2007 edition of HAZMAT Packager and Shipper, both the Transportation Security Administration and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration have been considering what substances to regulate for security purposes. Industry has been keen on PHMSA paring down its list of substances requiring the preparation of a security plan. Recently, TSA officials indicated that they have completed work on a list of Highway Security Sensitive Materials (HSSM) that is included in a regulatory proposal working its way through the clearance process at the Department of Homeland Security. In this report Mr. Wybenga discusses Security Action Items, and the HSSM list compared to other Hazmat security lists.

As previously discussed in the January/February 2007 edition of HAZMAT Packager and Shipper, both the Transportation Security Administration and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration have been considering what substances to regulate for security purposes. Industry has been keen on PHMSA paring down its list of substances requiring the preparation of a security plan. All would like to see a consistent approach by TSA and PHMSA on what materials actually pose a security risk. Recently, TSA officials indicated that they have completed work on a list of Highway Security Sensitive Materials (HSSM) that is included in a regulatory proposal working its way through the clearance process at the Department of Homeland Security. As the name implies, the HSSM list will only be applicable to materials transported by highway.

Under TSA’s plan, HSSM would be subdivided into two tiers with tier 1 representing the more hazardous materials from a security perspective. While the issue is fluid at the present time with draft legislation currently under consideration, TSA is expected to use the HSSM list as a basis for deciding which drivers should be subject to fingerprint based background checks. In addition, TSA has identified a list of voluntary Security Action Items (SAIs) it considers appropriate for transporting these materials. The action items include provisions on (1) general security (security assessment, inventory control, protection of information), (2) personnel (background checks, training for drivers and other personnel), (3) unauthorized access (access control of drivers, employees and vendors), and (4) enroute security measures. A list of enroute SAIs being contemplated is shown in Table 1. TSA will work with industry to implement the voluntary measures. Some of the SAIs may be impracticable for certain operations and this will need to be communicated to TSA as it progresses further in advancing security requirements.

Table 1: List of TSA Security Action Items for Enroute Security

This article, in its entirety,  is archived in HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's HazMat Database, an optional feature to subscribers. Information on obtaining a subscription to HAZMAT Packager & Shipper and its associated features can be found here.
 
 
Site Tools
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

Recent Examples of our Expert Level Analysis

PHMSA’s New Enforcement Plan

Preemption Argument against State Licensure Fees

Comments on DOT Interpretation letters; Section 178.2

Comments on DOT Interpretation letters; Sections 173.2a and 173.115

Miscellaneous Amendments to the HMR in HM-218D

Chemical Compatibility of Plastics Packaging

Question and Answer re 49 CFR 173.4, Small Quantity Exceptions

An Update on TSA Progress in Establishing a List of Security Sensitive Materials

Cross Bottling Composite IBCs intended for Hazardous Materials

Public Comments -- Proposed Recommended Practices for Bulk Loading and Unloading of Hazardous Materials in Transportation

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 173.217

UN Meetings in Geneva

Docket HM-215I Review

Security Regulations for Chemical Facilities

DOT announcements made at a recent DGAC meeting

Vibration Testing of IBCs with Water
 
UN Is Close to a Decision on Revised Limited Quantities Requirements

Problems with High Level DOT Specification Packaging Markings

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 172.401 and 172.407

Combustible Liquids: Dis-Harmonization Still Rules

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800

IMO DSC Subcommittee -- Dangerous Goods By Vessel

ICAO Panel Finalizes Amendments to ICAO Technical Instructions

Small Quantity Shipments

Revised ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 172.504

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation, Sections 171.8 and 173.25

Does a Generic LQ Mark for Limited Quantities Offer any Benefit

Shipping Name Markings on Portable Tanks

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.22 and 178.2

Questions for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

The Latest Round in the Revisions to the ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 171.16(d)

Summary of DOT’s FY2005 Hazardous Materials Penalty Action Report

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.12(c) and 173.28

UN Sub-Committee Meeting Report

Workshop on Reducing the Risk of Hazardous Materials Incidents During Loading and Unloading Operations 

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 172.802

Issues with Docket HM-206F NPRM

Where is DOT’s packaging testing program headed

Combination Packaging for Dangerous Goods Liquids Problem Assessment

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 172.101 and 173.199

Shipping ORM-D Consumer Commodity By Air