Skip to content
You are here: Home
Chemical Compatibility of Plastics Packagings
This article covers chemical compatibility of plastics packagings manufactured from polyethylene. Due to recent interest in compatibility, especially the possibility of permeation through plastics packagings creating a potentially hazardous situation, Mr. Lind discusses the UN, the U.S. DOT, and the ADR/RID provisions, and concludes that compatibility of plastics packagings and IBCs is an important factor to consider in safe storage and transportation of hazardous liquids and that permeation is a critical consideration in the packaging selection process.

Summary: This article covers chemical compatibility of plastics packagings manufactured from polyethylene, a widely employed primary raw material for packagings used in the transportation of hazardous materials. Much of this information has appeared in past articles published several years ago1. These articles covered the areas of permeation and environmental stress cracking in polyethylene packagings. Due to recent interest in compatibility, especially the possibility of permeation through plastics packagings creating a potentially hazardous situation, this subject is well worth re-visiting at this time. Coincidentally, it was addressed in a UN Information (INF) paper presented in December 20072 by Germany, at the 32nd session of the UN Sub-Committee of Experts (SCOE) on the Transport of Dangerous Goods. It is fully expected that the German delegation will introduce a formal paper on this subject at the July UN Subcommittee on the Transport of Dangerous Goods meeting.
 
Introduction
Knowledge of the chemical resistance of plastics to chemicals is essential in the selection of packagings for safely handling and transporting chemicals through typical distribution systems. While this information is needed for all types of materials going through the distribution system it is required knowledge when the materials being transported are hazardous materials or dangerous goods, as they are called internationally. When we speak here of “hazardous materials in the transportation environment”, for the most part we are referring to chemicals in polyethylene packagings, with High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) being the predominant material used in the construction of these packagings. And when we speak of plastics packagings larger than 5 U.S. gallons (20 liters) capacity, High Molecular Weight High Density Polyethylene (HMWHDPE) is the major plastic resin utilized. In this paper I will cover hazardous liquids, and hazardous solids that are likely to become liquid under the conditions of transport. First, I will point out the sections in various regulations that relate to compatibility issues such as permeation and chemical attack such as failure by stress cracking (ESC).

UN Provisions
There are references to permeation in the UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods – Model Regulations3 for rigid plastic IBCs, e.g. 31H1 and composite IBCs with plastic inner receptacles, e.g., 31HA1, sections 6.5.5.3.2… “Any permeation of the substance contained shall not constitute a danger under normal conditions of transport”, and 6.5.5.4.6… “Any permeation of the substance contained shall not constitute a danger under normal conditions of transport”, respectively.

In the case of plastics drums and jerricans there is no reference to permeation, however there is a suggested procedure to determine compatibility set forth in section 6.1.5.2.4:

“Additional steps shall be taken to ascertain that the plastics material used in the manufacture of plastics drums, plastics jerricans and composite packagings (plastics material) intended to contain liquids complies with the requirements in 6.1.1.2, 6.1.4.8.1 and 6.1.4.8.3. This may be done, for example, by submitting sample receptacles or packagings to a preliminary test extending over a long period, for example six months, during which the samples would remain filled with the substances they are intended to contain, and after which the samples shall be submitted to the applicable tests listed in 6.1.5.3, 6.1.5.4, 6.1.5.5 and 6.1.5.6. For substances which may cause stress-cracking or weakening in plastics drums or jerricans, the sample, filled with the substance or another substance that is known to have at least as severe a stress cracking influence on the plastics material in question, shall be subjected to a superimposed load equivalent to the total mass of identical packages which might be stacked on it during transport. The minimum height of the stack including the test sample shall be 3 metres”.

This article, in its entirety,  is archived in HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's HazMat Database, an optional feature to subscribers. Information on obtaining a subscription to HAZMAT Packager & Shipper and its associated features can be found here.
 
 
Site Tools
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

Recent Examples of our Expert Level Analysis

PHMSA’s New Enforcement Plan

Preemption Argument against State Licensure Fees

Comments on DOT Interpretation letters; Section 178.2

Comments on DOT Interpretation letters; Sections 173.2a and 173.115

Miscellaneous Amendments to the HMR in HM-218D

Chemical Compatibility of Plastics Packaging

Question and Answer re 49 CFR 173.4, Small Quantity Exceptions

An Update on TSA Progress in Establishing a List of Security Sensitive Materials

Cross Bottling Composite IBCs intended for Hazardous Materials

Public Comments -- Proposed Recommended Practices for Bulk Loading and Unloading of Hazardous Materials in Transportation

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 173.217

UN Meetings in Geneva

Docket HM-215I Review

Security Regulations for Chemical Facilities

DOT announcements made at a recent DGAC meeting

Vibration Testing of IBCs with Water
 
UN Is Close to a Decision on Revised Limited Quantities Requirements

Problems with High Level DOT Specification Packaging Markings

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 172.401 and 172.407

Combustible Liquids: Dis-Harmonization Still Rules

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800

IMO DSC Subcommittee -- Dangerous Goods By Vessel

ICAO Panel Finalizes Amendments to ICAO Technical Instructions

Small Quantity Shipments

Revised ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 172.504

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation, Sections 171.8 and 173.25

Does a Generic LQ Mark for Limited Quantities Offer any Benefit

Shipping Name Markings on Portable Tanks

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.22 and 178.2

Questions for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

The Latest Round in the Revisions to the ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 171.16(d)

Summary of DOT’s FY2005 Hazardous Materials Penalty Action Report

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.12(c) and 173.28

UN Sub-Committee Meeting Report

Workshop on Reducing the Risk of Hazardous Materials Incidents During Loading and Unloading Operations 

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 172.802

Issues with Docket HM-206F NPRM

Where is DOT’s packaging testing program headed

Combination Packaging for Dangerous Goods Liquids Problem Assessment

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 172.101 and 173.199

Shipping ORM-D Consumer Commodity By Air