Skip to content
You are here: Home
Proposed Recommended Practices for Bulk Loading and Unloading of Hazardous Materials in Transportation
When the U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) adopted HM-223, it indicated that it did not fully “own” loading and unloading bulk hazardous materials from a jurisdictional perspective. HAZMAT Packager & Shipper has been covering this issue, and reported on the public workshops that PHMSA held. Recently PHMSA published a public notice in the Federal Register requesting public comments on the adoption of bulk loading and unloading practices. Several organizations and a number of companies submitted comments. Ms. Jones summarizes these comments.

When the U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) adopted HM-223, it indicated that it did not fully “own” loading and unloading bulk hazardous materials from a jurisdictional perspective. HAZMAT Packager & Shipper has been covering this issue, and reported on the public workshops that PHMSA held. Recently PHMSA published a public notice in the Federal Register requesting public comments on the adoption of bulk loading and unloading practices.

History
In our March/April 2007 issue, Senior Technical Advisor Frits Wybenga’s report titled “Analysis of Hazmat Incident Data Sheds New Light on Loading and Unloading” looked at the data PHMSA had collected over a three year period. He reported that based on its analysis of hazmat loading and unloading incidents, the agency had decided to consider hazmat loading and unloading a priority issue. In the May/June 2007 issue, HAZMAT Packager & Shipper interviewed Bob Chipkevich, who is the director of the Office of Railroad, Pipeline, and Hazardous Materials Investigations for the National Transportation Safety Board. Mr. Chipkevich gave his perspectives on the regulation of bulk loading and unloading operations, and what he hopes will occur in the future regarding the changes in the regulations. Mr. Chipkevich believes that “safety requirements should provide sufficient direction to ensure that personnel involved in safety-critical loading and unloading operations are provided with clear written procedures and that they are properly trained and qualified.”

On June 14, 2007, PHMSA held a public workshop on reducing the risk in the loading and unloading of hazardous materials. Senior Technical Advisor Frits Wybenga covered the workshop in our July/August 2007 issue in a report titled “PHMSA Holds a Workshop on Reducing the Risks of Hazardous Materials Incidents During Loading and Unloading Operations”. The workshop was divided into panels that considered the definition of the problem and identification of a possible solution. It covered industry perspectives, emergency response community perspectives, and the perspectives of the federal government. The workshop was used to give PHMSA a fresh look at the issue. On January 4, 2008, PHSMA announced it was seeking public comments on reducing the risks of hazardous materials incidents during loading and unloading operations. The initial deadline for comments was February 8, 2008, but was later extended to March 14, 2008. Several organizations and a number of companies submitted comments. Some of these are summarized in the following.

National Transportation Safety Board
Many companies support PHMSA setting bulk loading and unloading practices. The National Transportation Safety Board believes that the practices are comprehensive and satisfactorily address safety issues, but is concerned that the proposed practices are only recommended and that implementations would be left up to the shipper, carrier, or consignee of the hazardous material. Under the best of circumstances compliance would be selective and inconsistent, and under the worst circumstances they would not be met at all. Due to these concerns the Safety Board encourages PHMSA to adopt these recommended practices directly or by reference into the Hazardous Materials Regulations.

This article, in its entirety,  is archived in HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's HazMat Database, an optional feature to subscribers. Information on obtaining a subscription to HAZMAT Packager & Shipper and its associated features can be found here.
 
 
Site Tools
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

Recent Examples of our Expert Level Analysis

PHMSA’s New Enforcement Plan

Preemption Argument against State Licensure Fees

Comments on DOT Interpretation letters; Section 178.2

Comments on DOT Interpretation letters; Sections 173.2a and 173.115

Miscellaneous Amendments to the HMR in HM-218D

Chemical Compatibility of Plastics Packaging

Question and Answer re 49 CFR 173.4, Small Quantity Exceptions

An Update on TSA Progress in Establishing a List of Security Sensitive Materials

Cross Bottling Composite IBCs intended for Hazardous Materials

Public Comments -- Proposed Recommended Practices for Bulk Loading and Unloading of Hazardous Materials in Transportation

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 173.217

UN Meetings in Geneva

Docket HM-215I Review

Security Regulations for Chemical Facilities

DOT announcements made at a recent DGAC meeting

Vibration Testing of IBCs with Water
 
UN Is Close to a Decision on Revised Limited Quantities Requirements

Problems with High Level DOT Specification Packaging Markings

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 172.401 and 172.407

Combustible Liquids: Dis-Harmonization Still Rules

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800

IMO DSC Subcommittee -- Dangerous Goods By Vessel

ICAO Panel Finalizes Amendments to ICAO Technical Instructions

Small Quantity Shipments

Revised ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 172.504

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation, Sections 171.8 and 173.25

Does a Generic LQ Mark for Limited Quantities Offer any Benefit

Shipping Name Markings on Portable Tanks

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.22 and 178.2

Questions for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

The Latest Round in the Revisions to the ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 171.16(d)

Summary of DOT’s FY2005 Hazardous Materials Penalty Action Report

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.12(c) and 173.28

UN Sub-Committee Meeting Report

Workshop on Reducing the Risk of Hazardous Materials Incidents During Loading and Unloading Operations 

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 172.802

Issues with Docket HM-206F NPRM

Where is DOT’s packaging testing program headed

Combination Packaging for Dangerous Goods Liquids Problem Assessment

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 172.101 and 173.199

Shipping ORM-D Consumer Commodity By Air