Skip to content
You are here: Home
A Summary of DOT’s FY2005 Hazardous Materials Penalty Action Report

By Frits Wybenga, Senior Technical Advisor    September, 2007

HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's exclusive report on FY2005 penalty actions by the U.S. DOT and the U.S. Coast Guard provides insight on the most commonly cited violations of the Hazardous Materials Regulations and is intended as both a decision making and training guide for those who must comply with the rules.

 


 

 

PHMSA recently posted the FY2005 Penalty Action Report on its website. A review of the penalty actions provides some perspective about what inspectors from each of the DOT agencies focus on in their inspections. By studying the report and coming to understand the violations brought against companies with similar hazmat operations, this sheds light on what DOT inspectors are focusing and could help company compliance personnel correct deficiencies in their own operations before they are faced with a DOT inspection. At the same time it helps identify areas hazmat trainers should focus on when providing hazmat training.

The following table provides a brief overview of the results of the hazmat enforcement programs of DOT and the US Coast Guard. The amount collected in FY05 is considerably less than that collected in FY04 with the amount differing by approximately $2.7M, or a 25% decrease from the FY04 amount. Most of the decrease is attributable to the Federal Railroad Administration where the amount of collected penalties went from $2.7M in FY04 to $0.3M in FY05. The other agencies showed markedly smaller fluctuations. The table shows that shippers are the primary focus of each agency. The balance of the focus of each agency is usually on carriers except for PHMSA which places extensive enforcement effort on packaging manufacturers and cylinder retesters.
 




    

With the penalty actions of most agencies extending over many pages, detailed review can be daunting. For these agencies, a summary of the 15 most frequently cited regulations gives an indication of what regulations inspectors may be focusing on when performing an inspection.* The top 15 regulations cited represent at a minimum 80% of regulatory citations of each agency. With only 15 cases completed by the US Coast Guard in FY 2005 and little repetition of regulations violated, interested readers would probably benefit more from examining the few cases than a summary. For each of the other agencies, a summary of the most commonly cited regulations is provided. These are accompanied with a limited number of noteworthy comments but for the most part the summaries speak for themselves.

Enforcement by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
A review of the penalty data suggests that at least half of the FAA cases result from reports by carriers, possibly when a package has been mishandled and a liquid begins to flow from the package. For these cases, with so many basic requirements being cited, it appears the shipments may have been undeclared with the shipper having made no attempt to comply with the regulations. This is evidenced by the frequent citing of requirements of the most basic nature such as the applicability requirements of the HMR, and shipping paper, labeling, and package marking requirements.

With FAA and PHMSA placing so much emphasis on closure requirements, it is interesting to note that §173.24(f), which would likely be cited if a closure failed, was only noted 21 times. This would suggest the overall occurrence of closure failures is relatively low.

A disturbing finding is that §173.27(b)(1) and (2) were referenced on 69 occasions, suggesting that number of attempts were made to transport materials forbidden from carriage on passenger or cargo aircraft.

Compared to other agencies, the number of carrier operational violations is relatively low. The most common Part 175 regulation cited is §175.30 (35 occasions), presumably when the carrier was found to have accepted a hazmat package not in complete compliance with the regulations.

This article, in its entirety,  is archived in HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's HazMat Database, an optional feature to subscribers. Information on obtaining a subscription to HAZMAT Packager & Shipper and its associated features can be found here.

 
 
Site Tools
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

Recent Examples of our Expert Level Analysis

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 173.217

UN Meetings in Geneva

Docket HM-215I Review

Security Regulations for Chemical Facilities

DOT announcements made at a recent DGAC meeting

Vibration Testing of IBCs with Water
 
UN Is Close to a Decision on Revised Limited Quantities Requirements

Problems with High Level DOT Specification Packaging Markings

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 172.401 and 172.407

Combustible Liquids: Dis-Harmonization Still Rules

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800

IMO DSC Subcommittee -- Dangerous Goods By Vessel

ICAO Panel Finalizes Amendments to ICAO Technical Instructions

Small Quantity Shipments

Revised ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 172.504

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation, Sections 171.8 and 173.25

Does a Generic LQ Mark for Limited Quantities Offer any Benefit

Shipping Name Markings on Portable Tanks

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.22 and 178.2

Questions for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

The Latest Round in the Revisions to the ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 171.16(d)

Summary of DOT’s FY2005 Hazardous Materials Penalty Action Report

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.12(c) and 173.28

UN Sub-Committee Meeting Report

Workshop on Reducing the Risk of Hazardous Materials Incidents During Loading and Unloading Operations 

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 172.802

Issues with Docket HM-206F NPRM

Where is DOT’s packaging testing program headed

Combination Packaging for Dangerous Goods Liquids Problem Assessment

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 172.101 and 173.199

Shipping ORM-D Consumer Commodity By Air