Skip to content
You are here: Home
Security Regulations May Affect You: What to Do if You are Considered a Chemical Facility by DHS

By Glenn Wicks, Esq. and Lindsay McGuire, Esq., The Wicks Group    January, 2008

The events of September 11th drew national attention to the deficiency in American infrastructure security. Congress responded in various ways, including by authorizing Federal regulation of high-risk chemical facilities for security reasons. In 2007, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) published the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (“CFATS”) regulations. Under the regulations, any facility that possesses one or more chemicals of interest (“COIs”) must submit relevant information to DHS, through a “Top-Screen” submission, by January 22, 2008 or within sixty days of coming into possession of a COI. In this article The Wicks Group discusses these regulations, and what chemical facilities must do in order to meet requirements set forth by the DHS.

 


 

 

The events of September 11th drew national attention to the deficiency in American infrastructure security. Congress responded in various ways, including by authorizing Federal regulation of high-risk chemical facilities for security reasons. In 2007, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) published the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (“CFATS”) regulations. Don’t let the name fool you: the regulations cover more than typical chemical facilities. The term “chemical facility” refers to any facility that possesses a chemical DHS considers potentially dangerous if targeted in a terrorist attack. Under the regulations, any facility that possesses one or more chemicals of interest (“COIs”) must submit relevant information to DHS, through a “Top-Screen” submission, by January 22, 2008 or within sixty days of coming into possession of a COI. Based on this information, DHS determines which facilities present a high security risk. These high-risk facilities must comply with CFATS, meaning that they must come into compliance with risk-based performance standards. Those facilities that are not designated as high-risk do not need to take any further action. The first step, however, is for any facility that possesses chemicals to determine if it is required to comply with the CFATS regulations.
The COI’s are identified at this DHS website location: http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/chemsec_appendixafinalrule.pdf

Any facility, regardless of the nature of its business, that possesses a COI must comply with the first part of the CFATS regulations: registering to access the Chemical Security Assessment Tool (“CSAT”) and submitting the Top-Screen, which includes information regarding the facility, its chemical inventory, and its current security measures. This is the primary way that DHS identifies high-risk facilities. Less frequently, DHS will notify a chemical facility that it must complete the Top-Screen submission. If a facility is not contacted by DHS, it must consult Appendix A to the CFATS regulations to determine if it is required to submit a Top-Screen.

Appendix A lists the COIs, as well as the minimum concentration and amount of each that will trigger the registration and Top-Screen requirements. If a facility possesses even one COI in the minimum concentration and amount, it must satisfy these requirements. It may seem as if DHS is being overly cautious in setting the bar for registration and submission so low, but keep in mind that many facilities will not have to take any additional precautionary steps. Furthermore, registration and submission of the Top-Screen are not very difficult or time-consuming.

Registering to access the CSAT system requires a facility to provide information on the person or persons who will be involved in submitting the Top-Screen, including his/her name, country of citizenship, and domicile. There are three roles involved in submitting the Top-Screen: (1) the Preparer, who enters the Top-Screen data; (2) the Submitter, who submits Top-Screen data to DHS; and (3) the Authorizer, who assures DHS that the Submitter and Preparer are authorized to complete or submit the Top-Screen information. All three roles can be filled by the same person or by different people. There is also a fourth and optional role: the Reviewer, who reviews the information but cannot enter, edit, or submit it. The registration must also indicate how these roles will be organized within each facility. Companies reporting more than one facility should consult the CSAT User Registration Guide, which is available online at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/chemsec_csatuserregismanual.pdf, to evaluate their best organizational option. The registration form is available online at https://csat-registration.dhs.gov. It must be completed and signed then mailed or faxed to DHS.

This article, in its entirety,  is archived in HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's HazMat Database, an optional feature to subscribers. Information on obtaining a subscription to HAZMAT Packager & Shipper and its associated features can be found here.

 
 
Site Tools
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

Recent Examples of our Expert Level Analysis

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 173.217

UN Meetings in Geneva

Docket HM-215I Review

Security Regulations for Chemical Facilities

DOT announcements made at a recent DGAC meeting

Vibration Testing of IBCs with Water
 
UN Is Close to a Decision on Revised Limited Quantities Requirements

Problems with High Level DOT Specification Packaging Markings

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 172.401 and 172.407

Combustible Liquids: Dis-Harmonization Still Rules

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800

IMO DSC Subcommittee -- Dangerous Goods By Vessel

ICAO Panel Finalizes Amendments to ICAO Technical Instructions

Small Quantity Shipments

Revised ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 172.504

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation, Sections 171.8 and 173.25

Does a Generic LQ Mark for Limited Quantities Offer any Benefit

Shipping Name Markings on Portable Tanks

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.22 and 178.2

Questions for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

The Latest Round in the Revisions to the ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 171.16(d)

Summary of DOT’s FY2005 Hazardous Materials Penalty Action Report

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.12(c) and 173.28

UN Sub-Committee Meeting Report

Workshop on Reducing the Risk of Hazardous Materials Incidents During Loading and Unloading Operations 

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 172.802

Issues with Docket HM-206F NPRM

Where is DOT’s packaging testing program headed

Combination Packaging for Dangerous Goods Liquids Problem Assessment

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 172.101 and 173.199

Shipping ORM-D Consumer Commodity By Air