Skip to content
You are here: Home
Comments on Sections 171.8 and 173.25

By Andy Altemos, Senior Technical Advisor    November, 2007

Stretch- or shrink-wrapped trays: What are they? Package or Overpack?

 


 

 

Sections 171.8 and 173.25,
letter dated October 17, 2007
to Mr. Richard Hessen,
Reckitt Benckiser, Inc.

This letter addresses the use of stretch- or shrink-wrapped trays as outer packagings for inner packagings that meet the requirements for limited quantities or consumer commodities, as authorized under § 173.25(b) of the HMR. One useful aspect of the letter is that it offers an interpretation of the intended meaning of the terms “shrink-wrapped tray” and “stretch-wrapped tray” - terms which are not actually defined in the HMR. The definitions offered by DOT are not themselves remarkable. For example, the definition of “tray” is a standard dictionary definition that would otherwise have been applicable in the absence of a specific definition for the term in the HMR. Nevertheless, the letter provides a clear statement of DOT’s intent that gives direction to those interested in employing this type of packaging. The letter also clarifies through example what would be considered a suitable “tray” for this purpose, and, in particular, that a flat sheet of corrugated fiberboard would not be considered a tray.

But what is of interest from a broader perspective is that the letter appears to imply that under the HMR this packaging system is considered an “overpack”. The letter states that under the HMR “shrink-wrapped or stretch-wrapped trays are considered ‘overpacks’ for consolidating inner packagings of limited quantity or consumer commodity hazardous materials”. In the UN Model Regulation and associated international regulations, shrink- or stretch-wrapped trays containing inner packaging are authorized “packages” for limited quantities of dangerous goods. Indeed, even in the text of § 173.25(b) the shrink- or stretch-wrapped trays are described as “outer packagings” for the inner packagings.

So, are these shrink-wrapped and stretch-wrapped trays with inner packagings containing limited quantity or consumer commodity hazardous materials “overpacks” or are they “packages”? As stated in the letter, in § 171.8 of the HMR, “overpack” is defined as “an enclosure used by a single consignor to provide protection or convenience in package handling, or to consolidate two or more packages” (emphasis added). Further, the term “packaging” (note that a “package” is simply a “packaging” with its contents) is defined in § 171.8 as “a receptacle and any other components or materials necessary for the receptacle to perform its containment function in conformance with the minimum packing requirements of [the HMR]” (emphasis added). Finally, “inner packaging” is defined as “a packaging for which an outer packaging is required for transport.”

This article, in its entirety,  is archived in HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's HazMat Database, an optional feature to subscribers. Information on obtaining a subscription to HAZMAT Packager & Shipper and its associated features can be found here.

 
 
Site Tools
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

Recent Examples of our Expert Level Analysis

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 173.217

UN Meetings in Geneva

Docket HM-215I Review

Security Regulations for Chemical Facilities

DOT announcements made at a recent DGAC meeting

Vibration Testing of IBCs with Water
 
UN Is Close to a Decision on Revised Limited Quantities Requirements

Problems with High Level DOT Specification Packaging Markings

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 172.401 and 172.407

Combustible Liquids: Dis-Harmonization Still Rules

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800

IMO DSC Subcommittee -- Dangerous Goods By Vessel

ICAO Panel Finalizes Amendments to ICAO Technical Instructions

Small Quantity Shipments

Revised ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 172.504

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation, Sections 171.8 and 173.25

Does a Generic LQ Mark for Limited Quantities Offer any Benefit

Shipping Name Markings on Portable Tanks

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.22 and 178.2

Questions for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

The Latest Round in the Revisions to the ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 171.16(d)

Summary of DOT’s FY2005 Hazardous Materials Penalty Action Report

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.12(c) and 173.28

UN Sub-Committee Meeting Report

Workshop on Reducing the Risk of Hazardous Materials Incidents During Loading and Unloading Operations 

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 172.802

Issues with Docket HM-206F NPRM

Where is DOT’s packaging testing program headed

Combination Packaging for Dangerous Goods Liquids Problem Assessment

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 172.101 and 173.199

Shipping ORM-D Consumer Commodity By Air