Skip to content
You are here: Home
ICAO Panel Adopts Revised and Reformatted Packing Instructions

By Andy Altemos, Senior Technical Advisor    November, 2007

The International Civil Aviation Organization’s (ICAO) Dangerous Goods Panel (DGP) has adopted revisions to, and completely reformatted the packing instructions appearing in the ICAO Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (“the ICAO Technical Instructions”). The revised instructions will be applicable under the Technical Instructions beginning from January 1, 2011. They will also be incorporated into the International Air Transport Association’s (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations from that date. Mr. Altemos details the history, and reasons for these changes, and the major changes that will be adopted. While there are objections to some of these changes, the DGP has made final decisions and these changes will have a major impact on ICAO’s technical instructions.

 


 

 

At an early November 2007 meeting, the International Civil Aviation Organization’s (ICAO) Dangerous Goods Panel (DGP) adopted revisions to, and completely reformatted the packing instructions appearing in the ICAO Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (“the ICAO Technical Instructions”). The revised instructions will be applicable under the Technical Instructions beginning from January 1, 2011. They will also be incorporated into the International Air Transport Association’s (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations from that date.

As a result of this decision, ALL of the current packing instructions applicable to dangerous goods in the ICAO Technical Instructions other than those in Class 1, Class 2 or Class 7, are to be revised and/or reformatted.

History and reasons for the changes
The decision to adopt the revised packing instructions culminated an effort by the DGP that extended over more than five years. It had its origins in the 1999 incorporation of the packing instructions into the UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (“the UN Model Regulations”). While the original concept was to more closely align the packing instructions in the Technical Instructions with those in the UN Model Regulations, over the years the ICAO effort took on a life of its own.

Proponents of a more comprehensive revision argued that this would result in a more user-friendly system. It would remove existing anomalies, inconsistencies and irrationalities in the current packing instructions (in terms of, for example, the kinds of packaging authorized for various dangerous goods). And finally, it would provide a new structure that would facilitate the assignment of packing provisions to new dangerous goods in a logical manner.

The content and format of the draft revised packing instructions changed considerably as this effort progressed. After several years of work, and a number of iterations, in 2006 a draft of the revised packing instructions was placed on an ICAO public website for review and comment. Comments submitted on that draft were considered by an ICAO working group that met in Memphis in May of this year (see summary on pages 10 and 11 of the May/June 2007 issue of HAZMAT Packager & Shipper).

Major changes adopted
As a result of this review, and apart from a number of detailed changes to the draft packing instructions, the working group agreed that several more fundamental changes should be made. These included a decision to abandon the proposed new alpha-numeric packing instruction identification system and instead to employ a three-digit numbering system similar to the current system.

With regard to the greatly expanded use of absorbent material that would have been required under the draft revised packing instructions, it was decided to limit the requirement for use of absorbent material to combination packages containing Packing Group I materials. As an alternative to provisions in the draft instructions that would have required the use of liners in combination packagings for virtually all liquids, the working group decided to enhance the requirements for the closures of inner packagings (e.g., that secondary means of “positive” closure be employed). Further, it was decided that only when such secondary means were not used would a liner be required within the outer packaging.

Description of the changes
A revised version of the packing instructions then followed and, again, was placed on the ICAO public website for review and comment. It was this version of the packing instructions that was considered by the ICAO DGP at its meeting in early November. Significant changes incorporated into this draft of the packing instructions included the following -

This article, in its entirety,  is archived in HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's HazMat Database, an optional feature to subscribers. Information on obtaining a subscription to HAZMAT Packager & Shipper and its associated features can be found here.

 
 
Site Tools
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

Recent Examples of our Expert Level Analysis

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 173.217

UN Meetings in Geneva

Docket HM-215I Review

Security Regulations for Chemical Facilities

DOT announcements made at a recent DGAC meeting

Vibration Testing of IBCs with Water
 
UN Is Close to a Decision on Revised Limited Quantities Requirements

Problems with High Level DOT Specification Packaging Markings

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 172.401 and 172.407

Combustible Liquids: Dis-Harmonization Still Rules

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800

IMO DSC Subcommittee -- Dangerous Goods By Vessel

ICAO Panel Finalizes Amendments to ICAO Technical Instructions

Small Quantity Shipments

Revised ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 172.504

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation, Sections 171.8 and 173.25

Does a Generic LQ Mark for Limited Quantities Offer any Benefit

Shipping Name Markings on Portable Tanks

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.22 and 178.2

Questions for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

The Latest Round in the Revisions to the ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 171.16(d)

Summary of DOT’s FY2005 Hazardous Materials Penalty Action Report

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.12(c) and 173.28

UN Sub-Committee Meeting Report

Workshop on Reducing the Risk of Hazardous Materials Incidents During Loading and Unloading Operations 

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 172.802

Issues with Docket HM-206F NPRM

Where is DOT’s packaging testing program headed

Combination Packaging for Dangerous Goods Liquids Problem Assessment

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 172.101 and 173.199

Shipping ORM-D Consumer Commodity By Air