Skip to content
You are here: Home
Comments on Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800

By Andy Altemos, Senior Technical Advisor    November, 2007

Third Parties: Offerors or advisors? It makes a difference.

 


 

 

Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800,
letter dated September 21, 2007
to Mr. Steve R. Tekosky,
Tatro Tekosky Sadwick LLP

Given the increasing use of third parties to assist companies with performing some or all of their hazardous materials transportation functions, in recent years we have drawn attention to a number of DOT interpretation letters that address the responsibilities of the parties in such arrangements. This letter is of particular interest in this regard - especially as it applies to the third party requirements relating to registration as an offeror or transporter of hazardous materials, for the preparation of security plans and for training.

The key to determining the extent to which the HMR requirements apply to a third party, such as a contractor or consultant, is whether that party is considered “a person who offers for transportation or transports a hazardous material in commerce”. Included as a person who offers a hazardous materials for transportation would be any person who - apart from physically tendering a hazardous material to a carrier - performs a pre-transportation function, as enumerated in the letter and in § 171.1(b) of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR).

This article, in its entirety,  is archived in HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's HazMat Database, an optional feature to subscribers. Information on obtaining a subscription to HAZMAT Packager & Shipper and its associated features can be found here.

 
 
Site Tools
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

Recent Examples of our Expert Level Analysis

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 173.217

UN Meetings in Geneva

Docket HM-215I Review

Security Regulations for Chemical Facilities

DOT announcements made at a recent DGAC meeting

Vibration Testing of IBCs with Water
 
UN Is Close to a Decision on Revised Limited Quantities Requirements

Problems with High Level DOT Specification Packaging Markings

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 172.401 and 172.407

Combustible Liquids: Dis-Harmonization Still Rules

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800

IMO DSC Subcommittee -- Dangerous Goods By Vessel

ICAO Panel Finalizes Amendments to ICAO Technical Instructions

Small Quantity Shipments

Revised ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 172.504

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation, Sections 171.8 and 173.25

Does a Generic LQ Mark for Limited Quantities Offer any Benefit

Shipping Name Markings on Portable Tanks

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.22 and 178.2

Questions for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

The Latest Round in the Revisions to the ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 171.16(d)

Summary of DOT’s FY2005 Hazardous Materials Penalty Action Report

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.12(c) and 173.28

UN Sub-Committee Meeting Report

Workshop on Reducing the Risk of Hazardous Materials Incidents During Loading and Unloading Operations 

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 172.802

Issues with Docket HM-206F NPRM

Where is DOT’s packaging testing program headed

Combination Packaging for Dangerous Goods Liquids Problem Assessment

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 172.101 and 173.199

Shipping ORM-D Consumer Commodity By Air