Skip to content
You are here: Home
Comments on Sections 172.401 and 172.407

By Andy Altemos, Senior Technical Advisor    November, 2007

GHS markings similar to class hazard transport labels on packages of materials: Prohibited marking? On packages not regulated as hazardous materials in transport: Compliance problem?

 


 

 

Sections 172.401 and 172.407,
letter dated September 28, 2007,
to Mr. Michael Morrissette, Dangerous Goods Advisory Council

The new UN Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (“the GHS”) is now being, or soon will be, implemented in various parts of the world. This new system will have to be taken into account when importing and exporting hazardous materials from and to the United States. Part of the GHS system involves the use of “pictograms” to convey the hazards of various chemicals covered by the system. These pictograms must be in the shape of a square-on-point which includes symbols and graphic elements to communicate the hazard of the material. Not only is the basic shape of these pictograms similar to that of the class hazard transport labels, but also the symbols used are in many cases similar to those used on transport labels. The similarity of the GHS pictograms to the transportation hazard labels both in terms of shape and content, had raised the question of whether display of those pictograms on packages in transport would be considered prohibited under the “prohibited labeling” provisions in § 172.401 of the HMR. Paragraph (b) of this section prohibits the display on any package offered for transport or transported, of any marking or label “which by its color, design, or shape could be confused with or conflict with a label prescribed by [the HMR]”.

This article, in its entirety,  is archived in HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's HazMat Database, an optional feature to subscribers. Information on obtaining a subscription to HAZMAT Packager & Shipper and its associated features can be found here.

 
 
Site Tools
Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size

Recent Examples of our Expert Level Analysis

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 173.217

UN Meetings in Geneva

Docket HM-215I Review

Security Regulations for Chemical Facilities

DOT announcements made at a recent DGAC meeting

Vibration Testing of IBCs with Water
 
UN Is Close to a Decision on Revised Limited Quantities Requirements

Problems with High Level DOT Specification Packaging Markings

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 172.401 and 172.407

Combustible Liquids: Dis-Harmonization Still Rules

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Sections 107.601, 171.1, and 172.800

IMO DSC Subcommittee -- Dangerous Goods By Vessel

ICAO Panel Finalizes Amendments to ICAO Technical Instructions

Small Quantity Shipments

Revised ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation: Section 172.504

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation, Sections 171.8 and 173.25

Does a Generic LQ Mark for Limited Quantities Offer any Benefit

Shipping Name Markings on Portable Tanks

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.22 and 178.2

Questions for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

The Latest Round in the Revisions to the ICAO Packing Instructions

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 171.16(d)

Summary of DOT’s FY2005 Hazardous Materials Penalty Action Report

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 173.12(c) and 173.28

UN Sub-Committee Meeting Report

Workshop on Reducing the Risk of Hazardous Materials Incidents During Loading and Unloading Operations 

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Section 172.802

Issues with Docket HM-206F NPRM

Where is DOT’s packaging testing program headed

Combination Packaging for Dangerous Goods Liquids Problem Assessment

Comments on DOT Letters of Interpretation; Sections 172.101 and 173.199

Shipping ORM-D Consumer Commodity By Air